|
''Sir Thomas More'' is an Elizabethan play and a dramatic biography based on particular events in the life of the Catholic martyr Thomas More, who rose to become the Lord Chancelor of England during the Reign of Henry VIII. The play is considered to be written by Anthony Munday and Henry Chettle and revised by several writers. It is particularly notable for a three page handwritten revision that is considered by many scholars to be by William Shakespeare.〔Long, William B. “The Occasion of the Book of Sir Thomas More”. Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4. page 49-54〕 This play is not simply biographical, because, for example, significant facts of More’s life are not described: There is no mention of his literary career, his book ''Utopia'', or the dispute between Henry VIII and the Pope in Rome. Also the life of More is at times expanded beyond what actually occurred and beyond the sources that were used, in order to suit the drama. What the play is about has been debated, but the issues revolve around obedience to the crown and rule of law, particularly when a populace becomes stirred up in an anti-alien fervor. Even More must obey; when he doesn’t he loses his life.〔Long, William B. “The Occasion of the Book of Sir Thomas More”. Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4. page 49-54〕 There are three primary actions in the drama: First is the uprising of 1517 known as Ill May Day and More’s quelling of the rioters. Second is the portrayal of More’s private life, his family and friendships, demonstrating his generosity, kindness, and wit. Third is his service as Privy Councillor and Lord Chamberlain, and the principled stand he took in opposition to the king, which leads to More’s execution. The particular articles More refuses to sign are never described, so the play avoids the specific conflict that occurred between the church in Rome and the English Church, and so then the story can focus on the issue of freedom of an individual conscience from worldly authority. This explains why Munday, who fought against the Catholic Church, would be an author of a play that vindicates More, a Catholic martyr. Munday’s abiding interest, as demonstrated in his other plays, was in speaking out against attacks on an individual’s freedom, attacks that came from both church and state.〔Melchiori, Giorgio. “The Book of Sir Thomas More: Dramatic Unity” Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4. page 78〕 Considered in terms of theatrical performance, it is seen as effective and dramatic in the scenes dealing with the rioting, it is warm and human when dealing with his private life, and it is sympathetic and admiring as More sticks to his principles in the conclusion of the play. It is considered to be the best of the dramatic biographies that were written in Elizabethan times. Even with these qualities it would not have attracted as much interest if it were not for the association this play has with Shakespeare. The original manuscript, involving so many revisions, has reinforced the incorrect idea that the play has been pieced together or is in poor condition. Instead, the revisions should be considered in recognizable theatrical terms as a script’s natural progression towards its being readied for production.〔Metz, Harold G. “‘Voice and Credyt’: The Scholars and Sir Thomas More”. Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4. page 11-54〕〔 Gabrieli, Vittorio. Melchiori, Giorgio, editors “Introduction”. Munday, Anthony. And others. ''Sir Thomas More''. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0-7190-1544-8. Page 1〕〔Long, William B. “The Occasion of the Book of Sir Thomas More”. Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4. page 49-54〕 The original manuscript is a handwritten text, now owned by the British Library. The manuscript is notable for the light it sheds on the collaborative nature of Elizabethan drama and theatrical censorship of the era. In 1871, Richard Simpson proposed that some additions to the play had been written by Shakespeare, and a year later James Spedding, editor of the works of Sir Francis Bacon, while rejecting some of Simpson's suggestions, supported the attribution to Shakespeare of the passage credited to Hand D. In 1916, the paleographer Sir Edward Maunde Thompson published a minute analysis of the handwriting of the addition and judged it to be Shakespeare's. The case was strengthened with the publication of ''Shakespeare's Hand in the Play of Sir Thomas More'' (1923)〔() Greg, W.W. editor. ''Shakespeare’s Hand in the Play of Sir Thomas More''. Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN 9781108015356.〕 by five noted scholars who analysed the play from multiple perspectives, all of which led to the same affirmative conclusion. A second significant gathering of scholars to consider ''Sir Thomas More'' grew out of a seminar that was held during the meeting of the Shakespeare Association of America at Ashland, Oregon in 1983. It resulted in a second book of essays, eight by eight different authors, that was published as ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; Essays on the Play and its Shakespearean Interest''. It is a comprehensive study of the manuscript, and states that it appears more likely than ever that Shakespeare did indeed contribute to the revision of this play.〔Howard-Hill, T.H. editor. ''Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More; essays on the play and its Shakespearean Interest''. Cambridge University Press. (1989) ISBN 0 521 34658 4.〕 This would make it the only surviving manuscript text written by Shakespeare. Although some dissenters remain, the attribution has been generally accepted since the mid-20th century and most authoritative editions of Shakespeare's works, including The Oxford Shakespeare, include the play. It was performed with Shakespeare's name included amongst the authors by the Royal Shakespeare Company in 2005. ==Characters== ''Sir Thomas More'' has an unusually high total of 59 speaking parts, including 22 in the first 500 lines of the play; this, plus crowd scenes, would have taxed the ability of any playing company of the time to stage it. The job could only be managed through complex doubling and more-than-doubling of roles by the actors. Out of necessity, the play is structured to allow for this multiple doubling of roles: it is set up in three phases—More's rise; More's Chancellorship; More's fall—with very limited overlap between the thirds. Only three characters, More himself and the Earls of Shrewsbury and Surrey, appear in all three portions; six other characters—Lady More, Palmer, Roper, Sergeant Downes, the Lord Mayor, and a sheriff—appear in two of the three segments. * Thomas More – undersheriff of London; later Sir Thomas More and Lord Chancellor ''In London'' * Earl of Shrewsbury * Earl of Surrey – characterised as Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey, but historically the events depicted involved his father, Thomas, Duke of Norfolk * John Lincoln – broker (the only executed rioter named in ''Holinshed's Chronicles'')〔.〕 * Williamson – carpenter (a conflation of two citizens mentioned in Holinshed)〔.〕 * Doll – Williamson's wife * George Betts – rioter * Clown Betts – Ralph, his brother (Holinshed mentions two brothers named "Bets" who were sentenced to death but pardoned)〔.〕 * Sherwin – goldsmith (mentioned in Holinshed as sentenced to death but pardoned)〔.〕 * Francis de Barde – a Lombard (Lombard banking was common in London)〔.〕 * Cavaler – a Lombard or a Frenchman, associated with de Barde * Lord Mayor of London – historically John Rest * Justice Suresby – magistrate * Lifter – cutpurse * Smart – plaintiff against Lifter (non-speaking role) * Recorder ''In Court'' * Sir Thomas Palmer – soldier and friend to King Henry VIII * Sir Roger Chomley – historically the Lieutenant of the Tower, but portrayed in the play as a member of the Council * Sir John Munday – an alderman * Downes – Sergeant-at-Arms to the King who is injured in the riots * Crofts – messenger * Randall – More's servant * Morris – secretary to the Bishop of Winchester * Jack Falconer – Morris' servant * Erasmus – Renaissance humanist and Catholic priest ''Lord Cardinal's Players'' * Inclination * Prologue * Wit * Lady Vanity * Luggins ''More's Party'' * Lady More – More's wife; historically Alice Middleton * William Roper – More's son-in-law * Roper's wife – More's daughter * More's other daughter – either Elizabeth (b. 1506), Cicely (b. 1507), or his stepdaughter, Alice〔.〕 * Lady More – More's second wife, Alice * Catesby – More's steward * Gough – More's secretary * Dr. Fisher, Bishop of Rochester ''Others'' * Lieutenant of the Tower of London * Gentleman Porter of the Tower * Three Warders of the Tower * Hangman * A poor woman – a client of More * More's Servants – Ned Butler, Robin Brewer, Giles Porter, and Ralph Horse-Keeper * Two Sheriffs * Messengers * Clerk of the Council * Officers, Justices, Rioters, Citizens, City Guard, Attendants, Serving-men, Lords, Ladies, Aldermen, Lords of the Council, Prentices〔; .〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Sir Thomas More (play)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|